I share the view that societies are running towards an abyss of humanity by blindly accelerate exploitation and destruction of human and natural resources and hindering healing processes required to unify humanity for the realization of economic and social equality, economic sustainability, and peace. But how the hell can an author of such a summary directly add in the second part of the sentence the demand for example for a total christianization or islamization of humanity? The reflection started so hopefully open, and then closed so brutally disappointing. Why isn’t it possible to just envision ‘Spirituality’ instead of a specific religion that often does not allow full collaboration with other religions? Isn’t it possible to stay (spiritually) open to developing towards realizing the necessity for humanity’s return to a more conscious, compassionate, fearless, and fulfilled life?